The rest on the flight into Egypt: a night piece
Catalogue #21, Rembrandt in black & white, The New testament, Webshop
Catalogue #21, Rembrandt in black & white, The New testament, Webshop
It is the only self-portrait in which he is seen wearing his ‘daily’ attire.
This etching is still considered to be a self-portrait by some authors, although the person depicted here shows little resemblance with Rembrandt. Also, we see a wart on the right cheek (warts had a negative connotation in the 17th century), not seen in any other self-portrait and the person shown seems to be much ‘bulkier’ than expected in a portrait of Rembrandt. Various other identifications have been made, like Admiral Philip van Dorp (Münz, Nowell-Usticke and Jan Six), Prince Adolf van Cleve (Middleton) and Prince Adolph of Gueldres (Blanc). The latter based on a resemblance with a painting by Rembrandt in 1635 Samson threatening his father-in-law, now in the Gemäldegalerie Berlin (Corpus A 109, Bredius 499). Biörklund suggested Joris de Caullery based on the likeliness with a portrait made in 1632 (Bredius 170, formerly in the Seligmann collection).
This etching is one of the most striking self-portraits in which only the shadowed areas are worked out in detail. The light comes in from the left, which is quite unusual. Although it dates from the same period it is not one of the experiments in facial expressions.
The hat in this etching is probably added later, as it is clearly etched on top of the hair. However, no impressions have been found without the hat to confirm this theory.
The type of coat is a 16th-century version, long out-of-fashion in Rembrandt’s days. It may have served the owner as a warm coat in a cold studio, since it appears in several other portraits of this period as well. Two of these coats were part of his inventory in 1656. The fur, shown in the hat as well as the coat, was a luxury item. Rembrandt excelled in depicting the texture in his paintings.
We see a seriously looking, young man with very bushy hair and a small moustache. Although the plate is probably made or finished by a pupil, it is clearly Rembrandt who is shown here. He wears a buttonless coat or mantle, with two layers and a small almost white collar. The background is empty, the light falls in from the right, leaving a shadow on the right cheek. Rembrandt etched some thirty ‘selfies’ over a period of more than thirty years. In many of these he is experimenting with special looks, uncommon clothing or shadows. Not in this one. Instead, it seems more a picture for a passport then a formal self-portrait.
Around 1630 Rembrandt made a number of small self-portraits in which he shows himself in a variation of moods. Other etchings in this series are B8, B10, B316 and B320. There are also four paintings (Bredius 1, 2, 5 and 6). Probably Rembrandt experimented with facial expressions (affecten or emotions) as an exercise for the biblical and historical scenes he painted later. This particular one has always been very popular, probably because one can almost ‘hear’ him shouting. Because of anguish or of fear? Given the black spot on his nose, which fades slightly in later impressions, could it be that he had recently suffered some injury? As in B10, the loose hair is adding to the emotions.
This is one of the best known self-portraits of Rembrandt. He is depicting himself as an artist with his wife Saskia on his side, with whom he married two years earlier. Rembrandt wears a 16th century beret with a brim. It is very unusual to see a self-portrait with another person.
This etching shows Rembrandt at the age of 33. At that moment he had just bought his new house at the Breestraat, the present Rembrandthuis. He portrays himself in a self-assured, almost arrogant pose. In clothes that were certainly not used in everyday life in that period. It is probably the best known and most popular of his self-portraits, which is supported by the numerous copies made by other artists.
Inspired by Caravaggio (1571-1610) and his followers, the Utrechtse Caravagisten, Rembrandt made several experimental self-portraits. This is clearly one of those. Rembrandt kept the whole face in the shadow, using only two small white dots to lighten up the eyes and a glimmer of light on the nose. He tried this shadow effect earlier (B 12), but that experiment failed miserably. It is the first self-portrait signed with his full name. The combination of the clothing is quite remarkable: the button and string on the left shoulder point at a ‘military’ shirt, yet the scarf is oriental (East Indian) and informal.
In this portrait Rembrandt has ‘dressed up’ as an oriental magistrate, although it is unlikely that he actually wore this outfit when he etched himself. As he did in other portraits he may have worked from imagination or used examples by other artists. The sword (of the type kris) shows only one waved side, whereas it should be waved on both sides. It is also hold incorrectly, since the hook (now shown under) is meant to protect the knuckles of the hand. In other words: Rembrandt was not very accurate when painting weapons.
Around 1630 Rembrandt made a number of small self-portraits, including four paintings, in which he shows himself in a variation of moods, in this case ‘full of sorrow’. Other etchings in this series are B10, B13, B316 and B320. There are also four paintings (Bredius 1, 2, 5 and 6). It is generally assumed that Rembrandt experimented with facial expressions (affecten or emotions) as an exercise for the biblical and historical scenes he painted later. It was probably Rembrandts intention to portray the full body after the 1st state, given the large unused space (cut off in the 2nd state). By doing so, the etching became one of the smallest in his oeuvre.
Around 1630 Rembrandt made a number of small self-portraits in which he shows himself in a variation of moods. Other etchings in this series are B8, B13, B316 and B320. There are also four paintings (Bredius 1, 2, 5 and 6). Probably Rembrandt experimented with facial expressions (affecten or emotions) as an exercise for the biblical and historical scenes he painted later. This is the only etching in which his mood is rather angry instead of the bewildered, laughing face in several other portraits. By turning the head in relation to the body, a suggestion of depth and movement is created. The shadow on the right cheek strengthens the angry mood. The coat is not worked out in detail, again focussing the attention to the face.
Very few artists depicted themselves as regularly as Rembrandt did. Apart from the paintings he is rightfully famous for, he made at least thirty etched self-portraits over a period of more than thirty years. Rembrandt made this etching in the year that he married Saskia. The long hair falling over his left shoulder is meant to break the symmetry. It is a cadenette, normally worn by aristocrats, not by artists. The right part of the band is left white. On purpose or unfinished? This is the only self-portrait in which he pictures himself smiling. Biörklund has named this etching Rembrandt with three moustaches, following the earlier French title.
Early in his career Rembrandt used self-portraits to master the technique of etching. Around 1629 he started to experiment with light and shadow, as he did in his early paintings. This is one of those ‘test-pieces’. Rembrandt was at the age of 24 when he made this self-portrait. He is not trying to ‘hide’ the imperfections in his face, like the thick nose and the short beard. In fact, these elements are sharpened by the light coming in from left. Which is quite unusual in etchings by Rembrandt.
Catalogue #21, Rembrandt in black & white, Studies and sketches
The portraits in the studies are all very easily painted, with full spontaneity. The two heads on the right and below are clearly portraits of Saskia, the third head is another person.
Catalogue #21, Rembrandt in black & white, Studies and sketches
The centrally placed woman is almost certainly Rembrandt’s wife Saskia, the four surrounding heads probably too. At the time, two years after their marriage, Saskia was 24 years old. The various painted, drawn and etched portraits of Saskia are ample evidence that she was not just Rembrandt’s love but also his muse.
Catalogue #21, Rembrandt in black & white, Studies and sketches
Catalogue #21, Rembrandt in black & white, Studies and sketches
Catalogue #21, Rembrandt in black & white, Studies and sketches
Around 1630 Rembrandt made a number of small self-portraits in which he shows himself in a variation of moods. Other etchings in this series are B8, B10, B13 and B320. There are also four paintings (Bredius 1, 2, 5 and 6). Probably Rembrandt experimented with facial expressions (affecten or emotions) as an exercise for the biblical and historical scenes he painted later. Strangely enough this portrait was not recognized as a self-portrait by Gersaint, when he made the first catalogue raisonnée about Rembrandt’s work (1751). Perry Chapman pointed at the fact that Rembrandt has given himself the exact facial expressions Karel van Mander described in his Schilder-boeck in 1604.
Catalogue #21, Fancy heads of men, Rembrandt in black & white
In earlier years this etching was known as het Joden doctertie, as described in the catalogue of the Amadé de Burgy sale in 1755. Later van Eeghen has suggested that the bookseller Samuel Smijters is pictured. Clement de Jonghe’s inventory of 1679 mentions an etched portrait of him. Smijters (d. 1644) was bookseller and art collector. It is very likely that Rembrandt met him during his many visits to auctions, where Rembrandt is recorded to have bought at least fifty prints in 1637 and thirty-two the next year.
Catalogue #21, Fancy heads of men, Rembrandt in black & white
The hair on top is still visible through the cap, making it likely that the cap was added at a later stage. There may even have been impressions of the bare-headed state, as Jordan has suggested, but these have so far not surfaced. Hind mentions that some impressions show a faint ‘R’ in the background at left.
Catalogue #21, Fancy heads of men, Rembrandt in black & white
In the sales catalogue of De Burgy (1755) this picture was referred to as Het portret van een ouden patriarch, met een bonten mantel om en een kostbaare bonnet op ’t hoofd (portrait of an old patriarch, with a fur coat and a precious biretta on his head). It sure is an unusual picture, with an oriental looking clasp and unspecific cap. It seems as if Rembrandt has been practicing on different fabrics, the velvet of the cap, the fur in the collar, the silk in the coat and the hair in the beard. Scholars differ in opinion whether this etching is part of the large group of studies of bearded men or a portrait of a (so far unknown) person, as Jan Six has suggested.
Catalogue #21, Fancy heads of men, Rembrandt in black & white
It is highly unlikely that the boy shown here is indeed William of Orange, as Blanc suggested in 1859. His identification is based on a painting which was previously attributed to Rembrandt, but is now considered to be a copy after Jan Lievens. A similar identification by Biörklund, based on an engraving by Willen Delff of 1635, seems to be more substantiated. In the inventory list of Clement de Jonghe of 1679 a portrait of schipper Gerbrants soontje (captain Gerbrants son) is listed, which may also refer to this etching.
Catalogue #21, Fancy heads of men, Rembrandt in black & white
Ever since Michel first introduced the idea (in 1890), experts have debated whether or not the person shown here is indeed Rembrandts father. Hind supports this view (p 48-49), pointing at many examples of the same head, even in works by Jan Lievens, Johannes van Vliet and Gerard Dou. They all worked in Rembrandts studio in Leyden and must have had easy access to his father at the time. The many states provide some insight into the working method of the artist in this stage of his career.
Catalogue #21, Fancy heads of men, Rembrandt in black & white
Because of the strong resemblance to a drawing of a prophet by Ferdinand Bol (now in Berlin, Hdg 35) it is often assumed that this etching is also made by Bol. But according to Münz the free style of the etching is a solid reason to attribute it to Rembrandt.
Catalogue #21, Fancy heads of men, Rembrandt in black & white
Around 1630 Rembrandt made several etchings of old men, as did his companion Jan Lievens. This is one of the two he made in the same year of the same subject (the other being B 325). Since the light is coming from above, part of the face is covered by shading.
Catalogue #21, Fancy heads of men, Rembrandt in black & white
With B 287 and B 288 this etching is part of a series of copies (in reverse) after etchings by Jan Lievens (1607-1674), in this case B 21, Holl. 36 made in 1631. It is one of the few etchings in which the light comes from the left side.
Catalogue #21, Fancy heads of men, Rembrandt in black & white
The hat of the man is a kolpak, a typical Polish Jewish headdress. The way the face and hat are worked out in detail in contrast with the quickly drawn, loose lines for the coat, is similar to the technique used in The White Negress (B 357), dated in the same year.
Catalogue #21, Fancy heads of men, Rembrandt in black & white
One of the smallest of all etchings shows a man with an Eastern European fur cap. For many authors the attribution to Rembrandt is doubtful. Although the fur hat is drawn with the same fine lines, almost scratches, that are seen in other, undisputed, works. The same applies for the shadow lines. However, the long lines in the coat could be made by another artist.
Catalogue #21, Fancy heads of men, Rembrandt in black & white
Despite the clear monogram many experts believe this etching is not by Rembrandt. However, the reasons for doing so are often unclear or inconsistent. It may well be an exercise in lighting, with the dark sections on the man’s right side and the lighter parts of cloak, head and nose on his left. This may also explain the many small changes, all related to shadows, made in the seven states.
Catalogue #21, Fancy heads of men, Rembrandt in black & white
Around 1635 Rembrandt made four portraits of (so far) unknown men. They were named ‘the oriental heads’, although there is no good reason for that name.
Catalogue #21, Fancy heads of men, Rembrandt in black & white
Catalogue #21, Fancy heads of men, Rembrandt in black & white
Catalogue #21, Fancy heads of men, Rembrandt in black & white
It is generally assumed (f.i. by Hind) that this plate, just as B 286 and B 288, is a copy (in reverse) made after an etching by Jan Lievens (in this case B20, Holl. 39). It is also assumed to be the work of a pupil (Ferdinand Bol, according to Münz) with retouches by Rembrandt. The addition ‘geretuckert’ to the signature supports this view. A similar qualification was found at some paintings in the list of the inventory of 1656. It is more likely that he made the picture after the Lievens etchings.
Catalogue #21, Fancy heads of men, Rembrandt in black & white
Despite the fact that this is a typical Rembrandtesque tronie, many early authors have questioned its authenticity and believe that Johannes van Vliet has worked on the plate, maybe from the 2nd state. The New Hollstein considers it authentic.
Catalogue #21, Fancy heads of men, Rembrandt in black & white
One of the series of an old man with long beards that Rembrandt made in this period.
Catalogue #21, Fancy heads of men, Rembrandt in black & white
A typical Rembrandt ‘tronie’.
Catalogue #21, Fancy heads of men, Rembrandt in black & white
Allegorical subjects, Catalogue #21, Rembrandt in black & white
Around 1630 Rembrandt etched a series of beggars. It is generally assumed that he was inspired by a series of beggars made by Callot in 1622. He copied the long parallel lines Callot used to indicate shadows. In turn, Rembrandt’s work has inspired many others, like Quast, Savery, van Vliet, van Schendel and Bloemaert, to produce series of beggars and other ‘street types’.
Allegorical subjects, Catalogue #21, Rembrandt in black & white
Allegorical subjects, Catalogue #21, Rembrandt in black & white
Despite the fact that several authors, starting with Blanc, noticed that the face of the ‘student’ looks suspiciously similar to that of Rembrandt himself, neither the subject, nor the scenery are the most debated aspects of this etching, The real debate is about a very deceptive copy included in a 17th century book on the Bible by Schabaelje Many authors assumed this to be a new state of the original. Some authors even described up to eight new states. Finally, in 1935, O.H.Barnard made clear how the Rembrandt original could be recognized by some saw traces in the left margin and by ‘little balls’ under the candlestick. The copy can also be identified with the lower outline of the chin which is exactly equidistant from the top and lower margins, whereas in the original the chin is 2 mm above the centreline.
Allegorical subjects, Catalogue #21, Rembrandt in black & white
This etching was named Het Schuytje op de Voorgrondt (The boat in the foreground) in Valerius Rover’s catalogue of 1731. It may have been part of a larger work, since it fits very well to the right of Canal with an angler and two swans (B235). It could well be, as suggested by several authors, that both etchings were originally made on one plate. Although part of the scenery (the boat moored in the reeds of the riverbank) looks distinctly Dutch, the hilly background and Romanesque church can certainly not be found in Holland. This combination of local and foreign landscapes is seen regularly in Rembrandts works. It indicates that he has probably not worked from life.